Inside Wikipedia’s AI ban

Project Liberty Substack

Imagine the following scenario.

  • You are responsible for maintaining the accuracy of seven million English-language articles on the internet.
  • You produce 500 new articles every single day, each one edited, fact-checked, and cited.
  • Your review process is slow and methodical, sometimes taking weeks.
  • The number of unpaid volunteers doing this work is declining.
  • And you’re facing a flood of AI-generated text that makes the review harder.

This is Wikipedia in 2026. And rather than accelerate with AI, earlier this year volunteer editors voted to ban AI-generated text across the English-language site.

It’s the opposite of what most institutions are doing. In this newsletter, we explore what that decision means for the community-powered online encyclopedia, how they are using AI, and how the decision could serve as a blueprint for other movement-building and resistance to Big Tech.

Discuss

OnAir membership is required. The lead Moderator for the discussions is Matthew Kovacev. We encourage civil, honest, and safe discourse. For more information on commenting and giving feedback, see our Comment Guidelines.

This is an open discussion on this news piece.

Home Forums Open Discussion

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Skip to toolbar